Thursday, June 14, 2012

Cradle-to-Cradle


            You may be wondering why I have a picture of a Cherry Blossom tree on my blog.  In Cradle-to-Cradle, McDonough and Braungart open chapter four with a discussion of how the blossoms on a cherry tree fall to the ground, decompose, and enrich the soil.  It seems to be a never-ending cycle.  This example reminds me of the plants in my front yard that die at the end of their growing season.  When these plants die, they create food for organisms in the soil.  When the next growing season comes along the plants regrow then eventually die.  This all explains a concept called, waste=food.  In today’s society though, some of this waste is toxic and harmful to the environment.  That is the point of this blog post, to explain what is happening with waste and how we can better manage it.

            Material waste is divided into two categories.  These are: biological mass and technical mass.  When these two become contaminated, that is where the problem begins.  The harmful chemicals eventually get into our water sources and affect our health.  According to Cradle-to-Cradle, if we continue to throw away the technical material and not recycle them, the world will become it’s own graveyard.  The world needs to establish the Cradle-to-Cradle system and start designing eco-friendly products from the very beginning to completely eliminate waste.  As I was watching the Case Study of Cradle-to-Cradle video, I came across this quote, “The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”  Albert Einstein is the person who is quoted to saying this.  We as people need to completely change our way of thinking when we are designing products.  We need to clear our slate and start all over in order to see change.

            Now on to the subject of recycling.  According to The Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability, most recycling today is considered down-cycling because of the recycled material’s poor quality.  The book states that the recycling systems that are in place today do not compare at all to nature’s recycling abilities.  With each recycle, the materials become less useful.  The alternative to this is up-cycling.  Up-cycling takes the recycled material and transforms it into a high-quality material that can be easily up-cycled again.  As stated before, this is in contrast to down-cycling that contains a mix of different materials that would not be useful to the environment.

            Cradle-to-Cradle, discusses how in earlier years, people would repair their appliances that broke down or sell them to junk dealers.  In today’s society, it is cheaper to simply replace the broken item for a new one.  Repair costs are high and to most people it’s not worth it.  What we don’t realize is that it is worth it for the environment.  Chapter four also discusses how cars are not designed from the beginning to break down into technical nutrients.  Below is a picture of the 2013 Ford Fusion.  Ford designed this car to reduce the amount of toxic materials that are used in the production of a car. 


Ford states that every Fusion manufactured will have unexpected material in various places of the car.  Denim is used to eliminate the noisy sounds of driving on a bumpy road.  The seats are made of Repreve yarn which is made from post-consumer waste.  The foam that is used inside of the seat cushions is made from a soy-based material.  And last, recycled plastic is used on the underside of the car.

            There are many standards used when producing a product.  These standards are put into place to ensure that the products made do not affect either our health or the environment.  One of these standards is the AAFA Restricted Substances list.  The AAFA (American Apparel and Footwear Association) Restricted Substances list is a list of all the restricted chemicals and substances that cannot be used in the production of a product.  Two of the substances that are restricted are lead and mercury.  These two substances are restricted in the use of children’s wear.  According to Alternative Medical, exposure to both can cause decreased appetite, constipation, vomiting, and learning problems. 

            Another standard set in place is the GOTS.  The Global Textile Standard is a standard that covers the entire production process of textiles.  To be considered “organic”, a textile product must contain at least 95% organic fibers.  The other 5% can contain natural or synthetic fibers that are not of the same material that is used in the other 95%.  A substance that is prohibited in the production of textiles is fluorocarbons.  Fluorocarbons are normally used in textiles to make the material water-repellant.  According to “fibre2fashion.com”, Fluorocarbons are difficult to break down naturally and because of this are considered to be organic pollutants.

            After doing some research on companies practicing sustainability, I came across two companies that have incorporated Cradle-to-Cradle in their productions.  I had discussed previously about the 2013 Ford Fusion.  I came across another sustainable effort that Ford is in the process of working on.  According to, From Principles to Practice by McDonough and Braungart, the company has started a Cradle-to-Cradle renovation to its Rouge River Industrial site by building a factory with a living roof and a landscape surrounded by wetlands that decontaminate the storm water.  Another company jumping on the bandwagon is Shaw Industries, a carpet manufacturer.  Shaw Industries is researching what is put into their carpets so they can become aware of the harmful chemicals and remove them entirely.   

            The United States has a huge impact on other countries that are either under-developed or developing.  While reading Cradle-to-Cradle, I came across a discussion of how countries other than the United States used to have sustainable practices but now these countries rely mainly on the Western World for food and resources.  We, the United States, need to realize the impact we have on these countries and how we have the ability to change their social paradigm.  What we practice influences other countries greatly.  We can have a positive impact on other countries and ourselves by practicing Cradle-to-Cradle and setting standards that eliminate hazardous waste in our environment. 




                            

12 comments:

  1. Rachel,

    You discuss how most people just throw stuff away like its no big deal. I am guilty of this myself!! I've read on other blogs and within my research that some companies allow you to bring back your old product so they can use and recycle the waste. I think this is a great way to eliminate some waste! Do you think consumers would utilize this option? Imagine what would happen if a lot of companies got on board with this! I love that Ford is getting creative with their products! Who would've thought that Denim could soften the noises of the road?! I too agree that the United States has a huge impact however I do think that some countries are way ahead of us in terms of sustainability? How do you think we can learn from them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cara,
      Yes I had discussed in my last blog about returning old items back to where you bought them so the items could be recycled of properly! I believe a lot of consumers would partake in this activity. Maybe stores could offer an incentive as well, such as offering a discount on their next purchase if they return old clothes to be recycled. And yes the denim in the new Ford Fusion interests me. Cars and clothes together, who doesn't love that? The denim apparently is processed into a sound dampening material. I do also agree with you when you say that other countries are more sustainable than we are at times. I looked up a list of the ten most sustainable countries in the world, and Iceland is number one. The United States was no where on the list. Whenever I picture Iceland I think of a very cold place. I imagine to keep the environment the way it is they cannot have any factories that emit harmful gases which could melt the ice all around the country. I'm sure they have regulations set in place to control the environment. I believe we could learn from countries such as Iceland, by physically going to these sustainable countries and learning from them. The best way to learn is to see everything in action. Going to these countries and just seeing how clean their environment is could impact the way we think greatly.

      Delete
    2. Rachel,

      I think its a great idea to visit other countries. My dad and I travel to Latvia ever summer to do dental work. I've always been told how behind they are in technology and I did not realize or believe what people said until I witnessed it myself. I believe if we traveled to Iceland and observed their sustainable ways, we could take away greater knowledge than being told or hearing through the grapevine the most sustainable approaches.

      Carly

      Delete
  2. Rachel,

    I enjoyed reading about the new 2013 Ford Fusion, I think it’s a remarkable car and was very efficient in taking advantage of material waste (textile and plastic). I agree with you that many of us here in the U.S. and even in other parts of the world could definitely help out our environment out a lot by practicing up-cycling. I think the problem is that many consumers aren’t really informed about how serious the issue really is or about ways that could help make it better. Do you have any ideas that could help consumers get on board?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nicole,
      I believe that t.v. commercials would be a very good route to get consumers on board. As long as the commercial is catchy and not boring then the consumer will become interested. If it's original and something that no one has seen before then I believe it will catch attention.

      Delete
  3. Rachel,

    As I read your blog, it made me realize how the different industries are intertwined. It was interesting to see how Ford used denim as part of their design. Who would have thought that a car manufacturer would use denims to reduce road noise? I have lost of old jeans I could donate for this cause! In the case study on Roehner textiles, they were able to produce a product that could be sold as mulch to the local gardeners. Wouldn’t it be great if every product could be taken apart and reused again as you discussed? What do you think it will take to bring more companies on board with this concept?

    Carly

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rachel,
    I think donating denim is such a good idea!! I feel like everyone always has several pair of jeans they don't wear anymore and could donate. Ford has a tab on their website titled "Your Ideas", what do you think of putting your suggestion on there? I think it would be fun to see how far up the ladder it went and if they did something about it!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cara,
      I think that would be an awesome idea! What if we all took our ideas and not only told them to ford but some apparel companies too. I wonder how many of the companies would listen to what we have to stay and if they would act on it?

      Carly

      Delete
  5. I don't know!! If you don't mind I think I might try to comment on the Ford website just to see what happens, what do ya think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cara,

      I think you should, that would be cool to see what they have to say! Rachel, you could also!

      Carly

      Delete
  6. I don't want to steal Rachel's thunder but if she doesn't want to I can definitely see what happens!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Cara and Carly,
    I don't mind at all! I will do it as well!

    ReplyDelete